This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
hypothetical_game_review [2019/12/10 09:40] lverona created |
hypothetical_game_review [2025/02/20 16:21] (current) lverona |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Hypothetical Game Review ====== | ====== Hypothetical Game Review ====== | ||
- | **Hypothetical Game Review** is a imagined magazine that provides game reviews. When a game developer is working on a game and imagines what the press will say, it's published in this magazine. | + | **Hypothetical Game Review** is an imagined magazine that provides game reviews. When a game developer is working on a game and imagines what the press will say, it's published in this magazine. |
- | Hypothetical Game Review has been established in the early 1950s. Since then its main reviewers have been Matt and Ralf, with occasional retorts from their boss Tom Higgins. | + | Hypothetical Game Review has been established in the early 1950s. Since then its main reviewers have been Matt and Ralf, with occasional retorts from their boss Tabetha Higgins. |
- | Matt is known to be extremely harsh in his commentary and pulls no punches. His usual review scores are 0/5, 1/5 and 2/5. | + | Matt is known to be extremely harsh in his commentary and pulls no punches. His usual review scores are 0/5, 1/5 and 1.6/5 |
- | Ralf is incredibly agreeable, rarely commits things to writing and is usually quoted as having said something. He always tries to give the game the benefit of the doubt, but always ends up saying something passive-aggressive about its author. | + | Ralf is incredibly agreeable, rarely commits things to writing and is usually quoted as having said something. He always tries to give the game the benefit of the doubt, but always ends up saying something passive-aggressive about the personality of its author. |